I’d like to begin with an expression of thanks to those in my BCM 212 class at the University of Wollongong for participating in the focus group I undertook. The response from classmates made this project possible and the results that made it into this report have allowed a space to be uncovered in the theorist sphere to understand the mindset of a student in Communications and Media. I’d also like to thank UOW tutor Renee Middlemost, who took notes whilst the focus group was being conducted by me up the front, this was a above and beyond effort and allowed me to have two samples of useful notes with my recorded device to make full use of the methodology. Renee and Kate Bowles time and support to all students within the tutorial and lecture, and ability to provide clarification and work to enhance my capabilities as a researcher have definitely affected the way I experience the world through a researcher’s lens.
This research project aimed to understand the intricacies of student motivation both intrinsically and extrinsically towards both starting and completing a project at university level. As a university student, my interest and corresponding curiosity into the way technology can submerge itself throughout cross-disciplinary practises and be applied to real world services that aim to improve or help a progressive society. With that, I wanted to know how those in similar university situations to me approach these tasks than can sometimes seem ambiguous or containing too much freedom. I believe that essays and projects or “digital artefacts” have a very important place in academic research, however, when one is used to compensate the others failure for the marks at the end of a subject, thats when I believe as a collective could be detrimental to the time and effort of others in the same medium.
Perhaps one of the main criteria in this overall assessment is my curiosity into the act of doing. The processes, skills and inevitably the failures that come with starting a digital project for a portfolio. Some further reading I’ve linked to my project introduction and something I want to reiterate based on the engagement and feedback from my tutor, is my passion for motivating students both new and existing, to undertake physical idea development. This is showcased through my guest speaking at a subject within communications and media, Convergent Media Practises (BCM112), whereby I love to hear the ideas from various people, and then encourage them to get in and start doing it. My curiosity almost took control of the focus group, as the questions I had prepared were quickly taken over by unscripted conversation and general improvised open questions. This is where the true interest was uncovered and indeed made the final product. In terms of considerations with regard to curiosity, it quickly lead me to start thinking about socially responsible research design. Thinking to myself, if i’m indeed creating a space that can be used by not only the students in moving forward and future assignments, but also teachers who can think about some of the points i’ve made in my research, but also outside bodies that can compare the results from my studies, to trends and workplace attitudes, my research has to be appropriately taken into account at the start of the project. I believe careful planning of time, question preparation, consistent talks with my tutor and the ability to adapt and accept any result and be reflective of this assisted me.
Critical judgment was almost something that came prominent within the secondary research component. The lack of specific information about what i learnt was a really niche question meant that I had to not only quickly adapt, but embrace the trajectory of where the research could go if given extended research time. I think the idea of my curiousity mentioned above meant that I had to be careful in what research I was presenting. A lot of the sources I was finding were interesting research but kind of alluded me to the fact that this space i’m working in is actually uncovered research, and what was interesting in fact in the project, was the trajectory to questions I was asking post-project. The idea of questioning education systems, a changing world dynamic, perhaps the relationship between graduating students exceeding or being ahead of society. These central ideas I believe is what is touched on with Mike Caulfield in his Digital Polarization Initiative,”One of our big focuses for the Digital Polarization Project has been to try to engage the curiosity of students — to get them to think like reporters rather than attorneys, as encyclopedists rather than activists. Turn off the rhetoric for a while and just delight in finding new things out.” (M Caulfield, 2017). This however, rather being applied to the research topic or question, was more onto me as a communications researching professional. Allowing me to accept that perhaps my research question initially doesn’t have an answer, but where the value sits is within the conversation and voices to do with the topic, such as those from my focus group, and gaining that contentment driven by my own curiosity.
The next aspect of this critical judgement was indeed the collection of data being transferred into useful data that I would then present into the findings. Focus groups only criticism from me was that everyone could chose to not share the information I required, fortunately the group I had gave some useful insight, however, as a professional showcase of research, I then had to decide which information stimulated the question I initially set out for, then, that was going to be valuable for the stakeholders i’m targeting and creating that dialogue between them.
I think in consideration of what could be improved or what went ‘wrong’ isn’t the correct terminology. The space is now left open for building or further development. A survey was considered in the context of the project, but the idea was more to create a new field of thinking, something that cracks open a new and interesting thinking methodology, and the research values showcased in the lectures were pivotal and referenced heavily. Perhaps this obligation to a wider audience is the main focus out of the research i’ve started. A focus group was a great addition to this kind of research, guided that I continued the upheld values of being a respectful and communicator and those involved were reassured their anonymity. I was in an interesting position, the idea that I was completing a project as a student, about other student project motivations, meant that I had a responsibility to not only represent the student body toward a higher stakeholder, but I also had to be aware that this had the potential to produce very limited content, that ultimately affected my results as a student. This was quickly overpowered however, by the above mentioned curiosity and passion for helping get creative ideas out in the open to showcase skillsets of others.