Idealogical Position

Posted on Updated on

In response to semiotics and ideology, I’ve found an image that had complexity in it’s meaning to explore the notions of denotation and connotation, and how the two create interpretations. I’ve chosen this image:

Semiotics is a field of study that is interested in understanding signs and the  way they are organised into the systems of meaning that give rise to   communication in the variety of different contexts. The interpretation of a sign is dependent on   the context in which it is  used, its relationship to other signs, and its   environment.

Roland Barthes identified structural relationships in the components of a   sign. His ideas centre on two different levels of signification: denotation and   connotation. Thus, denotation being the literal or primary meaning of a sign and connotation, meaning a sign acquires beyond its denotative meaning that results from the context in which it is applied.

At first there’s an obvious graphic and horrific response by the viewer that suggests “wow how unfortunate”. The denotation is that a giant light bulb has hit this individual fair in the head and assumingly killed him, or caused significant damage. We can lead to believe it’s fallen from the roof or even perhaps been used as a weapon, to which we then ponder what possible use would anyone have for a light of this scale? The connotation (Or what it means) is then open for interpretation. My first thought was the obvious, ouch, and then when I stopped and thought about it, it took me down a philosophical path of How our thoughts can be killing us. And then even further, How “overthinking” can kill us.

The light bulb is obviously big, which could allude some of the views to the notion of “Big ideas can get you killed”. The light has obviously came from above his position and planted from that trajectory, therefore justifying the “over” thinking. The thinking side of my interpretation comes from the sign of a light bulb conveying one’s idea or thought thus the picture below.

I typed into a “Google” search engine and an abundance of these images appeared. a common visual reference to thinking is indeed a light bulb. Thus, a lightbulb has connotations to thought or ideas but this is constructed and may not be the next persons first thought. So yes, I believe this above image does present possibilities to be read in more than one way because my opinion is based on my arbitrary interpretation of a light bulb as a sign. The next person to view this, might explore the fact of technology becoming too much, or simply that the roof wasn’t strong enough!

Therefore, we can create many connotations to an abundance of signs based on who we are and the context in which it’s being delivered. This can then be applied to media, and how they think about presenting content to their audiences, to evoke a response, both controversial and stereotypical.


2 thoughts on “Idealogical Position

    beefandbeans0 said:
    March 19, 2015 at 3:55 am

    What a great image for this task. When I first saw the image my mind immediately went to what i could see, a man killed by a giant light bulb.
    As I thought about the image though I interpreted that the light bulb is a metaphor for our ideas, and as the light bulb is so large, I assumed it was a big idea.
    Simply the conclusion that I drew from the image is that ‘big ideas will get you killed.’

    Liked by 1 person

    Aimee Claire said:
    April 20, 2015 at 1:12 am


    The concept you have conveyed in relation to the elements of semiotics, especially focusing on the range of different interpretations that are brought upon a sign is satisfactory. The outstanding method of introducing and discussing Ronald Barthes concept of the elements of semiology increased the value to your piece and demonstrated your effective research into the argument.The successful choice of utilizing such a complex representation to provide support to your argument evidently shows your depth of understanding to the interpretations of a sign and its elements associated with this. The use of your “tags” attached to your post, adds incredible value to your post, and attracts a large amount of interest from the audience interacting with these “tags” as well.If i were to make a suggestion, I would encourage you to hyperlink your references, however overall you had a significant post and used a representation that supported your argument greatly.


    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s